Gravhounds Play on Steam

Editorial policy

A fact needs two independent sources before I treat it as settled. One source stays labeled as one source. When two good sources disagree, both numbers stay. I do not average them.

An ice planet surface with a glowing portal and Gravhound crew
© Octopus Panic. Steam store screenshot.

What I will not fill in

Missing voice actors, missing planet names, missing mod names, and missing quota numbers stay blank. A single community wiki is not enough to name a breed or a planet when another page disagrees.

Live examples: the launch post says 22 turrets and deployable systems, while two outlets say 21. The Xbox store lists shared/split screen, and the developer FAQ does not confirm it. The demo’s current download state is also split between a news story and the store pages. Each of those pages keeps both sides.

Corrections

When a source changes, I change the cell and the checked date together. I do not silently swap a number. The footer date on each page is the last time that page’s record was aligned with the sources list at the bottom.

Night defense with a red laser turret firing into an alien swarm
© Octopus Panic. Steam store screenshot.

FAQ

What counts as two sources?

A studio page and a separate outlet. A syndicated copy of the same article does not count twice. Two store pages from the same company are both official, and I say so.

How should a status cell read?

“3 个来源”, “2 个来源”, or “1 个来源 · 新”. The cell is a count, not a shrug.

What if a number will change?

Price, review counts, and sale end dates say “as of 3 Nov 2026” until I check them again.

How do I challenge a line?

Email [email protected] with the page and a link. See contact.

Sources